A silver Vauxhall VX220 on track
← All guides

Supercharger

Supercharged boost that goes flat above about 5,000 rpm

Why boost on a supercharged Z22SE often stops rising above about 5,000 rpm, and what owners suggested in a 2016 thread: a fixed-displacement charger, volumetric efficiency, a restrictive manifold, the Laminovas, belt slip and the bypass valve. Theories, not tests.

vx220.info/guides/supercharged-boost-flat-above-5000-rpm · Last updated 31 October 2026

Applies to: VX220 and Speedster, SuperchargedDifficulty: ModerateTime: Reading guide

From a 2016 thread by supercharged owners, mostly with OBD Tuner or HPTuners ECUs. The numbers are what individuals logged, not limits, and most of the explanations were never tested. To read your own log correctly see Reading a MAP log on a supercharged car. For the supercharger itself see Supercharger installation on the Z22SE.

One owner (2016) had a Harrop on a 70 mm pulley making about 1.1 bar maximum, and asked why the boost pressure flat-lined from about 5,000 rpm to 7,500 rpm when every supercharger project he had worked on before had a boost curve that followed revs to the limiter. His earlier M62 did the same at a lower pressure. The charger speed rises a lot over that range but boost doesn't. The answers:

  • It is normal for a fixed displacement charger. The charger is driven from the crank, so for every crank revolution it moves a fixed volume of air (his simplified example: the charger turns twice per crank revolution and moves 2 x 1.32 litres, against 1.2 litres of engine displacement, so the manifold pressure is raised by a factor of about 2.2 at any rpm). Real boost is more complex because of leak paths and thermal efficiency. He said if boost rises sharply at the top end, then the head, cams or exhaust are beginning to cost you power, and that boost is really a measure of restriction. He called 1.15 bar "very very good" for the pulley size and power.
  • Volumetric efficiency. One owner said that on a fixed displacement charger you often see the manifold pressure change when the engine comes "on cam" and its volumetric efficiency reaches its peak: the boost on the dyno drops while the power goes up, because the engine is consuming more of the air. Before and after that point the manifold pressures tend to be higher. Another owner agreed, and said that with head work the peak VE could move up the rev range. He guessed the boost should rise again by about 6,500 but may not because of the Laminovas, and that a bigger charger may be needed if nothing else is wrong. These are theories, not tests.
  • A restrictive manifold. He said the flat boost is due to the restrictive manifold, and that this is the argument for one: with the M62 and lower boost (and less rotor leakage) the pressures balance at a much lower point than with the TVS. One owner didn't think the manifold alone could explain it.
  • The Laminovas. One owner wanted boost measured before and after the Laminova heat exchangers. Another owner ordered a fitting for the sandwich plate before them to measure the pressure drop, and planned a run without them. Several owners thought a run without them would be an interesting test.
  • Cams. One owner asked whether the intake cam has verniers to allow more overlap. Another owner asked to see low-rpm torque on the dyno to see how the cams behave.
  • Belt slip. A multi-rib belt needs to be surprisingly tight to prevent slip on the supercharger pulley, especially a small one. One owner once chased a low boost problem (on a different car) before someone suggested checking belt slip, and thought an optical rpm meter might show it on a dyno. Another owner had dyno-tested on a 5-rib belt and had just bought a 6-rib one. A third owner said the extreme option is to change to toothed pulleys and belt.
  • 5-rib or 6-rib belt: not agreed. One owner said a 5-rib gives less slip because the same spring tension puts more pressure on each rib, and a wider belt is only for strength. Another owner replied that with the same tension a 6-rib has 20% more surface to grip, and serpentine belts are made to mesh, and that otherwise we would all drive on very narrow tyres. Nobody tested it.
  • The bypass valve. One owner wondered whether the bypass valve was levelling the pressure. Another owner said no, it is a fixed displacement pump, and a third owner said the bypass only works for cruising and start-up. A fourth owner said the bypass should stay open at idle and low throttle and closed at full throttle, and said he had checked this by pointing a small security camera at the actuator. He added that an Eaton type blower's efficiency falls off as it nears its design upper rpm.
  • Intake restriction. Another owner asked about an intake restriction. One owner said he was running an LS4 throttle body and, at that point, no intake system, so it could take all the air it wanted.
  • A twin-screw alternative. One owner thought it would be interesting if anyone fitted a twin-screw (Lysholm) charger, since they have very little leak-back and keep pushing hard at high rpm. Nobody had.
A VCM Scanner dyno log with rpm, speed, injector duty, MAP, MAF, air/fuel ratio and knock traces rising to 7,157 rpm and a MAP of 227 kPa
One owner’s dyno log (2016) of his 2.0 Harrop engine: 80 mm pulley, stage 2 cams, 2.5 inch exhaust. MAP is 227 kPa (about 1.27 bar) at 7,157 rpm, with the same flat pressure curve. Another owner said it was logged through HPTuners from an LSJ ECU.
Help wanted
We don't have a boost log from a standard supercharger kit with the matching pulley size, or a result from the Laminova pressure drop test or the belt tests.

Send us details or photos →

Spotted a mistake, or have something to add? Tell us about it.

Sources & credit

Written up from these owners' original posts. Thanks to everyone who contributed.

Last updated 2026-10-31